The Hard Determinist Does Not Exist - 999 Words

People who believe that we have no free will, that there is no free actions are known as a hard determinists. In other words, hard determinism is the doctrine that there are no free actions. To them, everything is casually determined and no one acts freely. The hard determinist does not deny that it seems that we have free will. What they deny is that the way things seems is the way they are. Nothing could ever be any other way than the way it is. Choices do not exist, free will does not exist, and randomness does not exist. What happens depends entirely on the previous arrangements of its cause and could not be otherwise. Hard determinist argue that all human actions are casually determined and therefore we act freely and cannot be held morally responsible for our actions. As an example Bob and Tom are stuck in a room. In one hand, Bob has chocolate cake and in the other hand, he has an apple, Bob is offering him one. Tom was given a choice to either choose the chocolate cake or the apple and he chose the chocolate cakes. To Tom, in his mind, he would say that he chose the chocolate cake on his own free will. If he wanted to, he could have chosen the apple, nothing forced him to pick the chocolate cake, he chose it because he wanted it, and he was free to choose either. A hard determinist would say that his past events made him chose the chocolate cake. Maybe as a child, he was given the sweet sugary treat more often the healthy fresh apple and because of that reason, heShow MoreRelatedDefense of Hard Determinism1100 Words   |  5 PagesOF HARD DETERMINISM Hard Determinism argues that every event is causally determined. For an event ‘A’ to occur casually means that there are antecedent causes that ensure the occurrence of ‘A’ in accordance with impersonal, mechanical causal laws. To clarify hard determinism further, let me present hard determinism as an argument. Basically hard determinism argues that: (a) Determinism is true (b) Determinism is incompatible with free will (Holbach, 451). In defense of premise (a), the hard deterministRead MoreThe Master Of Their Destiny1446 Words   |  6 Pageswith free will. Even though there are many arguments against this theory compatibilism offers people a alternative way of thinking, than that their life is already planned out for them out of their control. A compatibilist or also known as a soft determinist holds the belief that free will and determinism are evidently linked or are compatible with each other. Determinism states that every event is casually necessitated by antecedent events, that the facts of the past, in conjunction with the laws ofRead MoreHow Libertarianism Is The Best Of The Three Views1085 Words   |  5 Pagesyou perform. The Libertarian view consists of one’s actions not being determined, which means that a person would have free will, which is a precondition for moral responsibility. Libertarianism is one of the views under incompatibilism along with Hard Determinism. The opposite of these views is Compatibilism. An example of Libertarianism is: right now, one can either stop reading this essay or can continue to read on. In Libertarianism your next action is not already determined for you, you mayRead MoreFree Will vs Determinism627 Words   |  3 Pageseffects of causal sequences; these sequences rais e questions about the freedom of the choices and actions. Determinists believe our decisions are controlled by previous exposure to differing situations and environments and that each and every one of our actions is caused by a specific prior action or cause. (a occurs because of b, b occurs because of c..etc) In the belief of a determinist, man is no exception to this rule and therefore we are not free due to our actions being a result of a previousRead MoreThe Case Of Mr. Puppet1587 Words   |  7 Pagesentirely. In any event is Mr. Puppet be considered legally responsible for his actions in our scenario given the cases above? Lastly who is that can be blamed for this act? There are three common views regarding the nature of reality: the hard determinist, the soft determinist, and the indeterminist. Regarding these views I aim to show not only is Mr. Puppet a free moral agent, but also that he is both legally responsible and blameworthy for his actions, regardless of any circumstances of his being or upbringingRead MoreAnswers1131 Words   |  5 PagesREADING RESPONSES Explain clearly and completely what makes it so difficult to prove that the external world exists. Why cant the senses be fully trusted? (There are multiple reasons Nagel cites as to why the senses may not be trustworthy – discuss them all.) It’s hard to prove that a physical world exists, because you can only rely on your experiences. Everything that we might have encounter in life, might have been a part of our minds. We could be in a dream state right now. If we try to proveRead MoreDiscussing the Claim that Freewill and Determinism are Incompatible893 Words   |  4 Pagesand not some other event, occurred. Is it often thought that if determinism of this sort is believed, then it implies that freewill does not exist. The argument is as follows: If every event is determined, including every act of choosing, then the choice made has already been determined so therefore cannot be free. Thus, freewill does not exist. If you agree with this argument then you are taking the position of incompatibilism. Incompatibilism is the principle that determinismRead MoreDeterminism Vs. Free Will1341 Words   |  6 PagesDeterminism is a doctrine suggesting that for every event there exist conditions that could cause no alternative event. Free will is a philosophical term describing a particular sort of capacity of rational agents to choose a course of action from among various alternatives. Understandably, the dichotomy between these two concepts is a topic philosophers have debated over for many years. As a result of these debates, a number of alternative philosophical perspectives arguing for the existence ofRead MoreWhat Is Stace s Position On The Problem Of Free Will And Casual Determinism Are Compatible1258 Words   |  6 Pagesposition or view that causal determinism is true, but we still act as free, morally responsible agents. In the absence of external constraints, our actions are caused by our desires. W.T Stace, wanted to prove that the hard determinist defini tion of â€Å"free† was incorrect. He posed that free does not mean random, but that our acts are casually determined in a particular fashion. There must be a deterministic or causal connection between our will and our actions. This allows us to take responsibility for ourRead MoreThe Ethics Of Human Action1629 Words   |  7 Pagesthe view that outside forces are responsible for human actions (Chaffee, 2016, p. 159). Extreme determinists, or â€Å"hard† determinists argue that every human action is caused by factors outside their control (Chaffee, 2016, p. 159). These factors can include predisposition at birth, their environment and experiences, their psychological make up, and social influences (Chaffee, 2016, pp. 159-160). Determinists believe that human freedom is merely an illusion (Chaffee, 2016, p. 159). Humans have no true